ASER Pakistan 2013 provides data on educational indicators from 138 rural districts and 10 urban districts. Since this report is published each year, it helps evaluate the differences if any in the educational outcomes when compared to the previous year. It also serves as an indirect evaluation mechanism of government programs thatâ€™s have been implemented in the past year. According to the report more children are out of school in rural areas than urban areas. Government schools are a dominant source in rural areas unlike urban areas despite the fact that children in government school perform worse than those in private schools throughout Pakistan. Another aspect that the report highlights is that paid private tuition while an urban phenomenon has also started spreading to the rural areas. Moreover, if the education indicators are considered provincially then Punjab outperforms every province. However, these differences may be due to different policies and financial resources pointing to a need of concentrating on bringing all province indicators at the same level. Thus, ASER reports are an important tool for policymakers to identify gaps in learning outcomes from different aspects.
This paper examines how an exogenous increase in information through the dissemination of report cards containing school and child-level test scores affects educational outcomes in rural markets with public and private schools. The findings from this paper demonstrate that information provision through report cards affected test scores, private school fees and enrollment. Test scores were higher and fees in private schools for children in treatment villages were lower. Thus, to the extent that households altered their investments in children, it appears that this investment may have been directed toward greater pressure on the school rather than investments at home. Two types of quantity adjustments accompanied these quality and price movements, through enrollment gains and through alternate schooling options. Hence, the paper makes an important contribution by focusing on capturing outcomes for all relevant players in the market, which few studies are able to do given the substantial data requirements. Furthermore, it shows that the dissemination of credible and comparable information on learning quality is an intervention that can improve performance in the private sector and simultaneously strengthen the public sector; such interventions can therefore become an integral part of government policy in an environment where the public and private sectors jointly provide a service.
This report focuses on the quality of education in the public primary schools in Punjab and studies the recent teacher development initiative in this context. The authorsâ€™ main point of interest is to discover the variation in average test scores across public schools and what school factors are correlated with that variation. Through the use of PEC data, they demonstrate that the quality gap between good and bad district is relatively smaller compared to the gap between good and bad school within any given district. They also corroborate findings in the literature by demonstrating that schools with higher student-teacher ratios perform poorly compared to other schools in terms of PEC scores, though the effect is small. The authors also lay the foundations of evaluating the government initiative, Continuous Professional Development (CPD), the new teacher professional development intervention and investigate the potential impact it has on student achievement. Preliminary findings suggest that activities organized under the CPD programme are rated favorably by all teachers but most prominently by teachers from low-performing schools. However, some problems exist in the design of the programme which if improved can help teachers become more effective and raise the quality of learning in schools.
This World Bank policy note points out the two major challenges for Pakistanâ€™s education sector, which are access and quality. However, it focuses on quality. The authors attribute low enrollment numbers and poor learning outcomes to poor teacher quality and accountability, inadequate and inefficient funding, and weak management and governance. They recommend developing and implementing policies that focus on teacher performance and management. Moreover, they suggest an increase in funding to improve resource-use efficiency and learning outcomes, which can be achieved by leveraging the contribution of the private sector. They also emphasize on the role of the federal government in promoting cohesion of the education system nationwide. Finally, they recommend enhanced learning-assessment systems to monitor progress in learning outcomes and in improvements in schooling quality over time.
In this paper, rates of return are compared of improving school quality versus increasing school availability, with both working through cognitive achievement to affect adult productivity as represented by wages. Cognitive achievement is determined by time schooling attainment, school quality and individual characteristics in a cognitive achievement production function. Due to the amount and difficulty of data required, this study is first in its kind. However it has important implications for policy makers faced with tradeoffs between investment in quality or quantity of schools and between focus on primary or secondary schools. The paper demonstrates that for the conditions facing Pakistan in the early 1990s, the rate of return to improving the quality of primary schooling was substantially greater than the rate of return to increasing access to middle school, although it is somewhat lower than the rate of return to expanding enrollment in low-quality primary schools.In this context, it appears that productivity and equity concerns both pointed towards expanding primary schools, even if they are of lower quality. However, it must be taken into account that these results are conditional on the context in which the data was collected. Thus, these results may be true for the early 90s, yet they may be vastly different for present times.
This report highlights the issues of quality education by collecting data from five to six quality schools, each at eight different sites across Pakistan. The findings of this study suggest that current investments in direct delivery of educational services such as teacher training, creation and training of school councils, supply of missing facilities, and financial and other incentives for students to attend schools, many of which may be achieving worthwhile intermediate results, are not a sufficient condition for sustainable reform. What appears to be crucially missing from the equation is a strategy for identifying the human resource with the potential to take reform forward, and a focused effort to create or sustain selective apex institutions with real depth and capacity. Thus, this study recommends focus on identification and promotion of the promising human resources present within schools, provision of a meaningful system of incentives to teachers and school leaders in improving the quality of schools, and reconceptualizing the current focus on the ability of schools councils to ensure community support to schools.
This policy based paper looks at evidence that can account for the variation in the learning levels of Pakistani children, through the use of test scores in the LEAPS survey. One of the major findings of this paper is that while there are differences across children from different parental backgrounds (children from wealthier backgrounds or with more educated parents know more), these differences are dwarfed by those across government and private schools and across good and bad government schools. The difference in learning between a high- performing and a low-performing government school is twenty-four timesthe difference between children from poor and non-poor backgrounds after controlling for observed child-level differences. Furthermore, the largest differences are between schools in the samevillage, so that there are some good (and some bad) schools in every village. The paper also discusses how the array of tests and outcomes, and the lack of coordination between different testing bodies severely limit the ability to draw meaningful inferences. Consequently, over the past 15 years there is lack of knowledge of whether performance has improved, whether provincial differences in achievement have declined or whether increasing enrollments have had an impact on learning.
This paper analyzes the impact of private tuition on academic performance, looking particularly at whether it can explain the observed learning gap between public and private schools and whether private tuition can help bridge this gap. A random-effects analysis using data from the Learning and Educational Achievement in Punjab Schools (LEAPS) panel, shows thatprivate tuition is, in fact, a supplement undertaken by already high-achieving students. Further, private school teachers and students are more likely to engage in these classes than public school students. This suggests that the private tuition phenomenon does not necessarily result from poor-quality public schools. The analysis also indicates that private tuition serves mainly as a substitute for help received at home. It adds value to public school students and a combination of private tuition and public schooling might, therefore, help close the learning gap between public and private schools.The main policy implication of this study is that the private tuition market should be regulated and made accessible to public school students, who would benefit most from such classes, allowing them to catch up with their private school counterparts.
This message is only visible to admins.
Problem displaying Facebook posts.
Click to show error